No objections from me! On Fri, 26 Oct 2018, 07:43 Tim and Alison Bentley, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Seems reasonable to me. > > On Fri, 26 Oct 2018, 05:43 Raoul Snyman via openlp-dev, < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 2018-10-25 21:35, Tomas Groth wrote: >> > The test_pylint is not as old as you think and is actually responsible >> > for >> > linting on Jenkins on the old setup... Also it should only run if you >> > target that script specifically, so typically not on local setups. If >> > the >> > new CI lint solution is superior it is ok to remove it. >> >> The new merge proposal pipeline in Jenkins uses pycodestyle directly. >> >> The older branch linting uses the pylint test. I think we should move >> away from the PyLint test and do linting directly with the 3rd party >> tools like the new merge proposal pipeline does. >> >> -- >> Raoul Snyman >> [email protected] >> _______________________________________________ >> openlp-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > openlp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev >
_______________________________________________ openlp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev
