Thanks! 2012/2/18 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
> I'll try to set up 2 instances and take a look what is going on > > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 17:11, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> yes but the beans in red5-service.xml I know for sure that those cannot >> be the problem, as this just has been working in previous versions of >> openmeetings/red5. >> >> >> Sebastian >> >> 2012/2/18 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> >> >>> Those defined in openmeetings-applicationContext.xml >>> and various services definitions (from red5-services/*xml) >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 17:02, [email protected] < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I think those names should only be unique inside the webapp's context. >>>> I mean Red5 does also natively use beans, spring et cetera. But it was >>>> possible to deploy multiple webapps into a single red5 container just like >>>> any other tomcat webapp. >>>> Each webapp had its own scope and RTMP-Endpoint. >>>> >>>> Which ejb's do you mean exactly? >>>> >>>> Sebastian >>>> >>>> >>>> 2012/2/18 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> >>>> >>>>> Hello Sebastian, >>>>> >>>>> I guess the cause of might be in the same ejb names. >>>>> If I'm not mistaken all beans need to have unique names (some names >>>>> are hardcoded in java files so it might be challenging task...). >>>>> >>>>> I can investigate. >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 16:51, [email protected] < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Maxim, >>>>>> >>>>>> in the past it was possible to deploy OpenMeetings (under a different >>>>>> webapp name of course) multiple times in the same Red5 container. >>>>>> >>>>>> Somehow this stopped working, I wonder why? >>>>>> The effect with OpenMeetings 1.9.1 is: >>>>>> If you deploy two instances of the openmeetings webapp into red5, the >>>>>> first one works as epxected, the second one, you are able to run the >>>>>> installer but after that the SWF just won't be able to connect via RTMP. >>>>>> Do you got an idea if your webapp renaming / dynamic context loader >>>>>> has something todo with it? >>>>>> I think the log files are produced correctly, so each instance has >>>>>> its own log, but I cannot remember 100% now, I will have to check that >>>>>> again. >>>>>> Maybe I should also do that test again with the latest updated red5 >>>>>> now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Sebastian >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Sebastian Wagner >>>>>> http://www.openmeetings.de >>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/ >>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de >>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> WBR >>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sebastian Wagner >>>> http://www.openmeetings.de >>>> http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/ >>>> http://www.webbase-design.de >>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> WBR >>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sebastian Wagner >> http://www.openmeetings.de >> http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/ >> http://www.webbase-design.de >> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >> [email protected] >> > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > -- Sebastian Wagner http://www.openmeetings.de http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/ http://www.webbase-design.de http://www.wagner-sebastian.com [email protected]
