OK I forgot about all these licensing issues all the time :) sorry On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:15 PM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote:
> I think "delete" in SVN terms does not mean that the code is gone. > You can still get it from the SVN history. > But I think we might run into issues when we try to graduate as Top Level > Project at the Apache Foundation if they find LGPL / Non APL compliant code > in our Repo. So I think we should delete at least those trees/outdated > branches and repositories that contain for example nuSOAP (or have some > migration plans for that) > > Sebastian > > 2012/6/14 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > > > Hello Sebastian, > > > > maybe it make sense to branch old code (not delete) ? > > > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 3:53 PM, [email protected] < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Eugen, > > > > > > which of those tree's in the SVN about the SugarCRM plugin are active? > > > I see 3 plugins versions in the plugin folder. > > > Could you delete those that are not in use? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Sebastian > > > > > > -- > > > Sebastian Wagner > > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > > > http://www.openmeetings.de > > > http://www.webbase-design.de > > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > > -- > Sebastian Wagner > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > http://www.openmeetings.de > http://www.webbase-design.de > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > [email protected] > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
