Screen sharing logs are reduced: revision 1355299 On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>wrote:
> I guess we should fix at least screensharing client prior to making new > TAG. > I'll wait. > Please let me know we anything else need to be done before creating new RC. > > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 4:39 PM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Release Candidate 2 won't be released because the Vote was negative on the >> general list at Apache Foundation. >> >> You could create a TAG RC3 and commit your big changes to trunk then. >> >> Sebastian >> >> 2012/6/29 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> >> >> > Are we going to release this version? >> > Can I commit my huge changes? >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:43 PM, [email protected] < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > @Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates? >> > > >> > > About License VS Notice file. From what I understood from >> > > >> > > >> > >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license >> > > >> > > >> > > "The NOTICE document is for additional copyright and attribution >> > statements >> > > those licenses may require." >> > > => As all libraries that are shipped are compliant to the Apache >> License >> > I >> > > would have expected that it is sufficient to only add a section to the >> > > Notice file where the License requires additionall attribution. >> > > All 3th party licenses are in the License file. >> > > I don't see any requirements for duplicating the same in the Notice >> file. >> > > >> > > Sebastian >> > > >> > > 2012/6/26 sebb <[email protected]> >> > > >> > > > On 26 June 2012 10:55, [email protected] <[email protected] >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > Hi, >> > > > > >> > > > > that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was >> voted >> > > > > negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came >> that >> > > far) >> > > > > >> > > > > There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list. >> > > > > Results: >> > > > > PPMC: >> > > > > aaf +1 (mentor) >> > > > > solomax +1 >> > > > > eschwert +1 >> > > > > alvaro +1 >> > > > > >> > > > > Wider Community: 3 times +3 >> > > > > >> > > > > Result Vote Thread: >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9MMjmZCbKKQ9ud64i4OPV2FJ9h6daqoS5q9%3DxOZVad_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> > > > > >> > > > > The Vote Thread: >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9Xo7B13C14Uqq8VF%3DTCh3C7PNX6%2BQ4YJvO0cDej0e9vA%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> > > > > >> > > > > Main changes are covered in the Readme: >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/README >> > > > > >> > > > > Full Changelog: >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/CHANGELOG >> > > > > >> > > > > Release artefacts: >> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc2/ >> > > > >> > > > The ASF releases source. >> > > > Why is there no Zip archive of the source? >> > > > There a zip and tar archives for the binary builds. >> > > > >> > > > The binary build includes a lot of 3rd party jars (about 80?, most >> of >> > > > them duplicated). >> > > > It's not clear if all the licenses for the included jars are >> included >> > > > in the LICENSE file. >> > > > I would expect some of them to require mention in the NOTICE file. >> > > > >> > > > The N&L files included in SVN, source and binary archives must >> relate >> > > > only to the content which is actually included. >> > > > This generally means different N&L files for the binary archives >> > > > (unless the binary is created only from the source). >> > > > >> > > > The NOTICE files must only have *required* notices. >> > > > >> > > > > Tag: >> > > > > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/ >> > > > >> > > > The NOTICE file looks wrong; it should not include the full licence >> > > > for iCal4j which should be in the appropriate LICENSE file. >> > > > The NOTICE file is for required notices only. >> > > > >> > > > As far as I can tell, only the FamFamFam icons are included in the >> > > > source release (and SVN) so the corresponding N&L files should only >> > > > refer to them. >> > > > >> > > > > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395): >> > > > > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS >> > > > > >> > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. >> > > > > >> > > > > [ ] +1 approve >> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion >> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> > > > > >> > > > > Best regards. >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > Sebastian Wagner >> > > > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >> > > > > http://www.openmeetings.de >> > > > > http://www.webbase-design.de >> > > > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >> > > > > [email protected] >> > > > >> > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Sebastian Wagner >> > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >> > > http://www.openmeetings.de >> > > http://www.webbase-design.de >> > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >> > > [email protected] >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > WBR >> > Maxim aka solomax >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Sebastian Wagner >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >> http://www.openmeetings.de >> http://www.webbase-design.de >> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >> [email protected] >> > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
