Yes, I need it to implement server push for Calendar and Chat.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:35 PM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Do you need those changes to continue your work? > > Sebastian > > > 2012/10/22 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > >> Hello Sebastian, >> >> Finally I was able to patch Red5 so it can work under Tomcat 7. >> Should I create custom patch in our sources? Or we are going to wait >> until Paul will merge it into Red5 sources? >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Maxim Solodovnik >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> AFAIK language files can be XML for wicket. So the number of files >>> remains the same. Only format will slightly changed >>> On Oct 14, 2012 6:31 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I don't think that we can just remove features. >>>> I general it is quite difficult to remove features in an Open Source >>>> project, cause as soon as you start a discussion about it on the mailing >>>> list there will be always somebody that tells you he needs that feature. >>>> >>>> The current language editing also has its advandtages. For example: You >>>> have all labels in a single XML file (so its easier to translate), you can >>>> export and import those at runtime, you can modify wording at runtime. >>>> Having the labels spread in many .property files does require to >>>> recompile the complete app for every label changed. And to translate the >>>> files you would need some extra tools to have those labels editable also >>>> for Non-Java programers. Property files are not UTF8 save. That means a >>>> Russian property file contains nothing human readable but only something >>>> like: >>>> >>>> \u00EF\u00BF\u00BD >>>> >>>> So, I am not a real fan of the i18n possibilities with .property files. >>>> Having them in XML has a lot of advantages and importing them into the DB >>>> makes it possible to edit them at runtime. >>>> >>>> Sebastian >>>> >>>> 2012/10/14 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> >>>> >>>>> I ain't implemented backup/restore. I thought users will use command >>>>> line instead. >>>>> I also thought we can get rid of language editor in favor of wicket >>>>> language files :) >>>>> On Oct 14, 2012 4:52 PM, "[email protected]" < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Maxim, >>>>>> >>>>>> sounds great! >>>>>> I currently study some of the upload form components in Wicket. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2012/10/14 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://code.google.com/p/red5/issues/detail?id=284&q=label%3AType-Defect >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Sebastian Wagner >>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de >>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sebastian Wagner >>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>>> http://www.webbase-design.de >>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> WBR >> Maxim aka solomax >> > > > > -- > Sebastian Wagner > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > http://www.webbase-design.de > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > [email protected] > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
