I believe room capacity check should also be added. I mean in our configuration we have 10 rooms and 2 servers 9 rooms has capacity of 1-10 1 room has capacity of 150
in such situation it is better to have room with capacity of 150 on separate server. On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:30 AM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > I have a request to discuss regarding clustering. > > Status: The syncing of the sessions in the cluster from the slaves to the > master is basically ready. So the master of the cluster has a light version > of the slave's session object, and it is possible for the master to find > out the load across the cluster. The master can also kick out users from a > conference room that is hosted on any slave. > > The question is know: How do we calculate which conference room is assigned > to which server? > Basically there is no need to have a configuration value in the > organization or conference room, that assigns the room to any server in the > cluster. > You can simply do that dynamically: *As soon as the first user enters the > conference room, the cluster checks which server has free capacities and > starts the conference room on that slave.* And then anybody joining the > conference will be redirected to the same server. > > I basically like this idea, as it makes it more dynamic and it is likely > that you will use your given resources better with such a solution then by > manually assigning slave/servers to conference rooms (often nobody uses > those rooms and the slave/server will be just a zombie server that is > blocked but has nothing todo). > > What do you think? > > Sebastian > -- > Sebastian Wagner > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > http://www.webbase-design.de > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > [email protected] > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
