Hooray :) less components is better :) On Jan 15, 2013 7:39 AM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have updated the graph for the cluster architecture: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENMEETINGS/Cluster+Master-Slave+overview > > The biggest change is that master and slave have the same database (or > database-cluster). That makes it a lot easier. > The master will still need to coordinate the load, so he needs to ping all > slaves to collect the load and redirect to the slave that has the least > traffic (or that actually already hosts the requested room) > However the slaves can handle both HTTP and RTMP traffic. There is no need > to separate that anymore as the slave would use the same database as the > master. > > For syncing the recordings and other files to the master HDD there are > multiple solutions. One would be like Maxim proposed to do a Samba mount. > The other is for example to use some RSync scripts. This can be decided by > the end user on its own. > > I think this is more suitable then the previous approach and uses the > standard mechanisms for clustering. > > Let me know what you think about that. > > Thanks! > Sebastian > > -- > Sebastian Wagner > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > http://www.webbase-design.de > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > [email protected] >
