Le jeudi 31 janvier 2008 à 21:10 +0100, Marcel Holtmann a écrit : [...] > > So, personnally, I'd favour an asynchronous API, with companion > > libraries to simplify usage if common tasks are really cumbersome and > > repetitive (ie: error prone) to write. > > Async, yes. Wrapper library, no. Actually the wrapper library is in most > cases the cause for errors.
_Bad_ wrapper library are cause of errors, like bad libraries (or bad OSes... BTW, I am definitely unable to go _back_ to Windows devel.: I've never been there personnally). Of course, if the wrapper library does not really simplify things, it is not needed. But when asynchronous execution is involved, some careful design/abstraction may help to prevent hard to debug bugs... DBus event filtering or signal registration syntax does not seem so straightforward to me but I did not look at all binding layers, only raw libdbus or Glib bindings. Rodolphe
