On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:41:23 +0200 Raphaël Jacquot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 20:51 +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:26:47 +0200 Raphaël Jacquot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > babbled: > > > > > Paul Jimenez wrote: > > > > > > > Stick with mini-USB; I hear China mandated it, and it's nice and > > > > standard anyway, so that's a good choice. Plus your customers have > > > > some investment in chargers & cables. Or go micro-USB - half the > > > > height, otherwise fairly similar. And still standardish. Maybe add > > > > another port so there's one dedicated host and one dedicated gadget > > > > port. > > > > > > mini usb is perfect, keep it. > > > micro is rather hard to find... > > > > the problem is mini usb is now "legacy" according to the usb org. all new > > devices are to use micro-usb, so like it or not - micro-usb is coming. it's > > the "new" mini-usb. > > ah. good to know then ;) > is it designed to be ambivalent (aka host / device at the same time ?) that i believe is the "usb on the go" (or was it "usb 2 go") spec. -- Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
