-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: > Andy Green wrote: >> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:48:48 +0000 >> [ 4.830000] Empty flash at 0x05d64a08 ends at 0x05d65000 > > I got these with a rootfs made for GTA01. Flash geometry is different in > GTA02, and mkfs.jffs2 has to use the correct erase and write block sizes, > or you get that sort of complaints.
No this is *definitely* from your canned image after some usage. The number of these "empty" guys increases with usage on the target. >> Initially these Empty flash notices disappeared entirely after using the >> canned filesystem from Werner, now there seems to be more of them. But >> it is true I am randomly resetting the board all day. > > Hmm, you probably flashed some different rootfs, which wasn't for GTA02. > My "canned" rootfs isn't a particularly good one, i.e., it still has the > "environment killer" bug, so I wouldn't recommend it as anything but a > reference for what you get with correct mkfs settings. Sure, I use it because it solves the mount delay. I removed the initcript that trashed the env partition after DFU-ing it in. > If you get such errors also with a "good" rootfs, then we'd have a new > problem at our hands, though. For this purpose, isn't your canned one a "good" one? - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHm4vOOjLpvpq7dMoRAkHhAJ4hSim0x5/bG2qPLXFBondADGmD0QCfVbrO u/yU4eiQM+JISNqKSIE9tww= =61jB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
