-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> One potential scenario I was thinking of would be a low-overhead task > that doesn't need a lot of peripherals, e.g., MP3 playback. There, it > may be possible to get better overall power efficiency by running at a > constant low speed than being in stop-and-go mode with bursts of high If you succeed to reduce the CPU consumption by making it take 100 times longer to do stuff, it also means you have to take the hit for 100 times as much power used everywhere else (esp SDRAM in active mode) while you wait. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHstALOjLpvpq7dMoRAv2yAKCN6RSTrj8nRCJ8A8eqrXqx2fKcmQCgiqCC J5ualY6YwPhJiWtipxKBKY0= =bonx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
