-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:01:10 +0000, Andy Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Somebody in the thread at some point said: >> >>> Well i did something like that for a custom omap3 board i have :-p >>> It's just another board. But then I'll need someone to test the patches >> on >>> GTA01 >>> as I'll have only GTA02 to try. >>> >>> Then we also have enough time to fixup some stuff during the process ;-) >> Wah sounds like we will owe you several barrels of beer if you can make >> headway on it. Werner has a GTA01. > > Ehehe... let's make a party here in Finland after we have an up and running > git tree :-p
Sure, I have been to Denmark, never been to Finland, a boozeup is always something to aim for :-) >> Thanks a lot for putting yourself up for this! If we can support it let >> us know... success here will make a huge difference to this project for >> sure. > > BTW, I'll have to comment on some patches before applying them, at least > pcf50606 has to be > redone otherwise it won't make it upstream. > > Backlight feature should go to drivers/video/backlight, RTC feature should > go to drivers/rtc and so on. > One could make a drivers/i2c/chips/pcf50606-core.c and that would export > the necessary read/write functions > to the other modules. > > I'll probably find some other issues when preparing the git tree, but let's > handle one issue at a time ;-) Yes this is exactly what I would expect to hear from upstream so good to hear it now. I guess the best way is to track each variance from what will be accepted into Bugzilla, so we don't lose track, maybe under a parent metabug. Then others can help out if you identify specific chunks of refactoring work. I guess you are going to need a public git repo and branches to manage this too, if anyone is going to cooperate with any subtasks they need to base off it, plus we can maybe base a development branch on it that has new stuff on top to assess how broken we are. If it is true I can start that process of getting auth for the git server. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH1nusOjLpvpq7dMoRAmWKAJ499hDf6y2T6H2gHUTLlBMFrn2bEACgjSrN uaJ3tBe/FVbJjrzao0vSPsM= =KD0w -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
