-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: > Andy Green wrote: >>> They're not *that* small and AFAIK not that cheap either ;-) >> Neither is the NOR we get rid of interestingly enough, > > Yup, but we'll almost certainly be able to get rid of the extra NOR > (or NAND) chip anyway, irrespective of the debug board solution.
Right, but as the thread title says, it is more about deprecating the "write-only" aspect which creates a lot of needless havoc and fear come production time. Because we can always "reset to factory" all the storage around the CPU using JTAG, "write-once" as a concept or excessive "protection" is not needed. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH1qPkOjLpvpq7dMoRAtdaAJ4lle0ILGllItoZElTx9JretMYNmgCfXhPH +3wldFgFwtAiLlzgxOX1mWQ= =5PCB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
