-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> -1 for writing our own bootloader > > If U-boot is bloated and big, we should certainly look into why that's > so and slim it down, but IMO we should avoid reinventing the wheel and > stick with what works. Huh I grepped it and it seems U-Boot already has s3c6400 support, I didn't realize. > If we want to do the boot-straight-to-kernel thing, that's fine too. > > The main thing in either case is that we get to leverage other work > being done that might be helpful (like drivers, etc) and don't have to > spend resources keeping up-to-date. OK it's a good point. I guess we can just set the configuration down to almost nothing and patch out any other junk that leaks in to get the same effect. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH4V0kOjLpvpq7dMoRAnj3AJ42mcEhk646qZrgt9OyyYuEdf8m8gCeLeXH rhY2bB6w0VooDd4xtSJJu90= =UnAY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
