-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> Really, why would we need any device driver in the bootloader? > Bootloader are not meant to deal with the device, they let the OS do it. We have to have a little device-specific knowledge in there to get at the kernel image over SD on VFAT for example, or it seems NAND bad block skipping, but it should be really really minimal. > And you're right, we could write a dozen of minimal bootloaders by the > same time we spend fixing/maintaining u-boot. Well if U-Boot already came patched and working, to start with it would be quicker to use it. But I prefer to get rid of it. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH4rkzOjLpvpq7dMoRAllHAJ0Yu9nN7qzv0gbivxleO00aF22nhQCgksUE wvkid8b/b276aNi2NgflWgE= =sGAg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
