-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Andy, I have a great idea. Maybe we should consider to have a dedicated low | power controller device to care about things like this, at least for |> =04 !? :-) ;-) Probably you could create a paper outlining some of the | benefits of such an approach, to convince the guys who do cost and risk | management. | I think it's worth it. And we seem to have quite some time to do so. Wow, cool. And the white paper has to be 5 lines or less to explain the abstract idea of s/w unmaintainability to the h/w folks. No problem. ~ Drivers bloat, diverge ~ pasted in rival cities ~ bring them together - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkhHykoACgkQOjLpvpq7dMoU5wCeP2qgUvh8eQLyHHV8kch2emZW U/gAoJXTTr9I08n02wB7u6WOkx7/HzJQ =Ft5/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
