Andy Green wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi folks - > > I brought over a ton of patches that had accumulated in andy branch into > stable tonight. Because I had Mike Westerhof's neospy patchset in andy > but I don't think it belongs in stable, and that patchset is very > invasive, a lot of patches needed meddling when neospy was removed from > the picture. So it's possible there might be some breakage in stable, > but I built it and it seemed OK, audio worked, bluetooth, was able to > make a test call, etc.
(I'm still hopelessly busy at my real job, but I did find a bit of time to examine this quickly; hopefully I'll have more time to commit to work on stuff starting this weekend.) It looks like more than the neospy stuff got yanked; there's a few vestigial fragments of some of the various changes left (declarations mainly) but nothing that looks like it will change anything from the old behavior. So from my point of view, the new stable has absolutely no improvements for GSM handling on the GTA01 nor does it have any of the GSM flow-control stuff for both 01 and 02. Is this intended? If so, what do we need to do to get any improvements into stable? [In the meantime, I'll rebase the patches to the stable and re-release updated kernels independently, as I did previously; I notice from the IRC channel chatter that people are using the changes.] > I rebased andy on stable now, which will make it simpler to sync them > day by day and avoid moving patchbombs around. Currently in andy branch > there are some pending touchscreen patches, Mike Westerhof's neospy > (hopefully not broken by all the shifting around) and I added back > Cesar's cpufreq stuff for now if anyone wants to give it a try. > > - -Andy > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAkhsCPMACgkQOjLpvpq7dMpc2wCfaXkMPkaQfnbQcSQ4hjuq9lPI > SycAn3Kix0LeMWNP4DfsVG/V1g/aF/73 > =F/wc > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Mike (mwester)
