Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Hello, in order to try to fix my huge issues with glamo [1], I've tried
| to apply the latest andy kernel patches for glamo itself:
|
|  - fix-glamo-turbo-host-interface.patch [2]
|  - fix-glamo-crank-memory-to-90MHz.patch [3]

Ooops I've just noticed that my thread title was wrong... I figure you've understood it but the "bad patch" is fix-glamo-turbo-host-interface.patch

I've changed the title, btw.

What I would do if I had ten minutes to rub together is write glamo
register at +0x200 to the pre-patch value of 0xef0 in suspend function
for it and write it back to 0xe03 at end of resume, see if that gets
around it.

However I've tried to do this, but I didn't get anything working. By the way I'm not a kernel hacker, so maybe I've just tried to do a too hard thing for me :P.

Finally what about merging the fix-glamo-crank-memory-to-90MHz.patch (the good one :P) to the stable branch? I've tested it for 10 days about and it simply seems to have positive effects (to me, it allows to use Xglamo daily without any freeze - I've really never got one since I'm using that patch, while before my glamo was freezing the phone about every few minutes of usage).

Bye!

--
Treviño's World - Life and Linux
http://www.3v1n0.net/


Reply via email to