After searching about and asking on IRC if anyone knew what the performance implications of the fix-glamo-crank-memory-to-90MHz.patch and fix-glamo-turbo-host-interface.patch patches to the andy kernel branch were and finding nothing, I was wondering if perhaps andy or someone could comment?
I'd like to know more too, btw from what I've tested the fix-glamo-crank-memory-to-90MHz.patch improves a lot the stability of the glamo chip. I don't know about the real performance gain since before of appling that patch using (X)glamo was impossible for me!
-- Treviño's World - Life and Linux http://www.3v1n0.net/
