-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: | Andy Green wrote: |> Rest of the exports in there are merely EXPORT_SYMBOL(), I don't think |> they will care on those grounds otherwise they would have done the _GPL |> thing on the rest of it. | | The general policy is not to break existing interfaces, but not to | extend them or open new ones. So it's not uncommon to see a module | use both.
My general policy is we don't need a big license thread when I plug one piece of GPL code into another one as a module, especially when we have a metric buttload of local patches since time immemorial. Please do continue this thread though if you have any ideas about my original question. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkjTl5QACgkQOjLpvpq7dMp0mACeISv94fGSH8sWYopM56n2zyzw KyMAn3x5oC83XQwczciS5eJTbAhtX0gM =ljYP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
