-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: | Mike (mwester) wrote: |> Dunno. Sadly, user-space has splintered into several different images, |> with variants on those (someone mentioned eight distinct images the |> other day) | | Urgh :-(
One of the happiest things I saw on GTA02 was Debian. I think it is great that folks are learning and driving things their own way with multiple distros instead of "Openmoko Windows XP" only. Over time they'll converge on the better stuff. |> And if none of the above makes any sense, I've just proven how confusing |> this all is to me! | | It seems that we all agree that the APM interface should go. That's Someone needs to test that the "apm" applet that folks are using in userspace does not actually need APM emulation in kernel. It kinda sounds like they should be related. Why don't you cook a kernel with the APM emulation unconfigured, and test it? - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkjkx40ACgkQOjLpvpq7dMogPQCeIaJPcZxIHZ4TMYi3NLvzv3zX FqMAmwY6MgtKdxBHhgqgMdw0x50q/dQe =oS/D -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
