Balaji Rao wrote: > Ah, now I remember! From the proposed sync callback, we wouldn't know > which completion to complete as we wouldn't be passed the adc_request > object. We could very well look at the queue head, but that would not be > a clean way to do it. What do you say ?
How about passing the request ? Or a void pointer that's passed to
the callback function, which then does with it whatever it wants,
i.e., the usual
..., void (*fn)(void *arg), void *arg, ...
idiom.
- Werner
