Werner Almesberger wrote: > Hmm, I don't have an IPW2200. http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers > says that is its monitor mode has some limitations, but I couldn't > find any details.
Who knows... I'm using also an injection patch that improves also the monitor mode capabilities. > I'll give my collection of mac80211 cards a try. This would be good ;) >> If you want I can send you my .pcap dump taken with airodump, but it >> basically says the same that you can figure from the dhcp tools logs. > > If you could mail me the capture file of the session with udhcpc, > that may be useful. Perhaps there's some indication why it didn't > like the first two offers. Ok, I'll send you. >> - There are issues with the DHCP and wpa that unfortunately I wasn't >> able to study. > > Hmm, Mickey told me today that there's a discussion about DHCP > problems with FSO MS5 on the support list. From what I gather there, > it might be DHCP racing with association. (Plus udhcpc doing things > that increase the confusion.) But that doesn't seem to be the problem > in your case since you're running things manually anyway. Exactly. >> I should find an open AP that doesn't give me an IP > > So the DHCP failure also happens without encryption ? Yes it happens... I got this in my pub, as said at the university (but I don't really know wich AP was causing this, since there are hundreads) and in other places I don't remember... >> (one is at my pub, >> but, you know... I can't go there to monitor wireless packages :P), > > Hmm, why not ? Sounds like a comfty enough setting for doing a bit of > network debugging and/or a good excuse for spending more time at the > pub ;-) If you're concered about other people's privacy, you can > always filter by MAC address. No this is not the problem... The main issue is that I hardly would be able to support the insults of my friends (not exactly tech-people) :D. -- Treviño's World - Life and Linux http://www.3v1n0.net/
