Andy Green <a...@openmoko.com> writes: > Somebody in the thread at some point said: > | Andy Green wrote: > |> along with toggling the flowcontrolled state. > | > | How about toggling CTS when we set flowcontrolled before suspending ? > | That way, we can't race with UART init. Even in the unlikely event > | that we suspend before the modem has had time to bring up its UART, > | it wouldn't matter because then nobody has set up the modem anyway. > > I was going to say then we stink up normal UART suspend function which > doesn't know about GSM, but actually we can just do it in neo1973-pm-gsm > suspend, it's neat and tidy.
For some reasoning about why user-space needs to apply/release this flow-control instead of the kernel please consider looking at a) and b) at http://trac.freesmartphone.org/ticket/31#comment:3 -- Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software! mailto:fercer...@gmail.com
