Andy Green <[email protected]> writes: > | Andy Green wrote (ao): > |> Otherwise, they will simply propose people keep using U-Boot and not Qi > |> as their "fix". To the extent we pull some extra current until GSM is > |> turned on, Qi is then compatible with old and new kernels. So it's the > |> best path right now AFAICT. > | > | Would it be too inconvenient to have a 'correct' Qi and a > | 'backwards compatible' Qi? > > It's not inconvenient if it can choose what to do at runtime, based on a > sign from the U-Boot header that the kernel it's going to run can cope > with the right thing.
Not compatible with zImage btw. Andy, i'm sad to see how you want to spend time to introduce ugliness that no distro maintainer seem to want. -- Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software! mailto:[email protected]
