Michael Trimarchi wrote: > Subject: [PATCH 3/4] Little clean up and move the do_irq on a deferrable work
Hmm, why do you call it a tasklet if it's a work queue ? :) Second, why do you need that change in the first place ? Does the old mechanism have performance issues ? Or are you running into a locking conflict somewhere ? Making the interrupt processing deferrable looks dangerous to me. If you need this to make things work, this usually suggests that the logic is upside-down somewhere else. - Werner
