[Joerg Reisenweber Mi 18. November 2009]: > [Lars-Peter Clausen Mo 2. November 2009]: > > The original concern was that with irqs enabled a irq could be > > triggered in between and the irq handler would run long enough to > > screw the transmission up. On the other hand a transaction of 8 bits > > takes 1.5 s > > That'd be *really* bad. According to above, this is ms then, not seconds > > > > so running with irqs disabled is no option either. > > > Rethink, regarding above.
especially I think we shouldn't be too concerned about disabling all IRQ for 1.5 MILLIseconds /j
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
