Nelson Castillo wrote: > The main problem now is that there is no way from userpace to > communicate back to the kernel. But this might not be needed if it's > OK to lose some computing power (not much I guess).
You mean for the sample rate change ? It seems that this is the kind of kernel change that wouldn't face much resistance. Of course, if the overhead is negligible even at a high rate, you may not care. (I don't remember - is it ?) > I'd like to test soon (I'm running with something here but I might > find the time). Kewl ! - Werner
