Hi, Martin, Here is the test results for .29 with drm and .32:
http://www.bsdmn.com/openmoko/debugtest2/resultsnew.txt It look like .29 with drm is a bit faster than defconfig .32 do not have debug options turned on, so almost everywhere it is on the par with defconfig, most places it is slightly better. Gennady В Втр, 12/01/2010 в 13:47 +0100, Martin Jansa пишет: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:59:28PM +0300, Gennady Kupava wrote: > > hi all, > > Hi Gennady, > > > here is test results for individual options many people wanted: > > > > http://www.bsdmn.com/openmoko/debugoptstesting/ > > Wow, great numbers!, thanks for those test... I'm looking forward for > kernel guys decision and I'll apply it to SHR-U as soon as they decide. > > As you already have this testsuite, can you please try it with those 3 > kernels (first one 2.6.29-drm is the same as andy-tracking with DRM > patches from Thomas Weiss - there shouldn't be much difference, and the > .31, .32 is from corresponding openmoko kernel branches also with > applied DRM patches and we would like to switch SHR-U to .32 as soon as > suspend is resolved there.. > > http://build.shr-project.org/tests/mrmoku/kms/images/om-gta02/ > > or just latest .32 if you don't want to spend more time with it.. > http://build.shr-project.org/tests/mrmoku/kms/images/om-gta02/uImage-2.6.32-oe1+gitr0+5e5d518ecad86cc891d91c88d3b144eb30339bca-r4-om-gta02.bin > > > Thanks a lot! >
