Hi, thanks for your FCSE patchset update. I will test it in couple of days with SHR on my Neo FreeRunner and if everything will be alright I'll ask for submission to Openmoko kernel tree. I hope FCSE patchset will reach Linux mainline soon.
Best regards, Martin 'Martix' Holec 2011/2/15 Gilles Chanteperdrix <[email protected]>: > Gennady Kupava wrote: >> В Втр, 15/02/2011 в 04:44 +0100, Gilles Chanteperdrix пишет: >>> Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: >>>> On Sunday 19 September 2010 13:52:21 Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>>>> Gennady Kupava wrote: >>>>>> В Сбт, 18/09/2010 в 22:53 +0300, Vasily Khoruzhick пишет: >>>>>>> So, what about FCSE patches for 2.6.36? >>>>>> And for 2.6.34. >>>>> I did not work on this. Do not worry, I will notify you when it is done. >>>> Ping? >>>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> the patch series for FCSE with Linux 2.6.37 is available in the >>> following git repository: >>> git://git.xenomai.org/ipipe-gch.git >>> in a branch named fcse-2.6.37 >>> Also available through gitweb here: >>> http://git.xenomai.org/?p=ipipe-gch.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/fcse-2.6.37 >>> >>> This is a forward port of the 2.6.33 v4 patch, a few things have >>> changed, a few cleanups here and there, while splitting the patch in >>> several parts. The most notable change is that we no longer restart >>> cache flushes when they were preempted, it was, in fact, useless. >>> >>> Also, I noticed that the hackbench test is not the only one in LTP >>> testsuite to benefit from the speed improvement brought by this patch, >>> the whole LTP testsuite takes actually 15% less time to execute with the >>> FCSE patch on. >>> >>> I think the patch series can be submitted to mainline, at least as a >>> request for comments. If you end up submitting them after 2.6.38 is out, >>> then please tell me, and I will rebase on 2.6.38. The most tedious part >>> of the job was to split the patch in several parts, now that it is done, >>> we can rebase easily. >> >> Hi, Gilles, >> >> My plan with your patches is to test it here with lmbench, but I have >> some troubles with .37 at this moment, so i need to go other round to >> resolve .37 problems first. I'll post lmbench result then it'll be >> ready. > > No problem, I am not in a hurry, I do not hope much from mainline > submission, my aim is to work on the Adeos I-pipe patch for ARM, and now > that I have the FCSE, I can work on that. Simply, what I meant to tell, > is that if we rebase the patch on 2.6.38, we need to revalidate it > before submission, we can not send it simply rebased and hope that it works. > > Note that tests with lmbench have already been done, you may find the > results in the paper we made with Richard Cochran: > http://sisyphus.hd.free.fr/~gilles/pub/fcse/paper.pdf > > Regards. > > -- > Gilles. > > >
