Thanks a lot Jonathan, that is exactly what I was suspecting. In my case the 
optimum is 1 node and one thread then. 
Best regards,
Murat

--

Prof. Murat Yildizoglu
[email protected]

> Le 4 nov. 2015 à 12:57, Jonathan Passerat-Palmbach 
> <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
> Hi Murat,
> 
> Don't think jobs when you're in OpenMOLE.
> Think of what each of the tasks in the workflow needs to run correctly
> and as fast as you want.
> 
> So if each of your 100 experiment require 1 node and 4 threads, that's
> how you want to define your PBS environment.
> 
> Cheers
> J.
> 
>> On 04/11/15 11:38, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
>> Hi Romain,
>> The zip idea seems good, I will check it.
>> 
>> Concerning the PBS, what I would like to understand is the following:
>> 
>> Imagine that I have 100 experiments coming out from the sampling of the
>> parameters
>> 
>> How many jobs, each with which demands from cluster resources, OM will
>> launch in the following two  cases :
>> 
>> nodes=50,
>> threads=2
>> 
>> or nodes=1
>> threads=1
>> 
>> My current settings were
>> 
>> nodes=50,
>> threads=4
>> 
>> Hoping that OM would launch 200 jobs in parallel on 50 nodes, but it
>> seems to give these requirements to each job it generates, which slows
>> of course their position in the queue.
>> 
>> I hope that I am clear enough this time :-)
>> 
>> By the way, I love the new OM.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Murat
>> 
>> 2015-11-04 11:40 GMT+01:00 Romain Reuillon <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>> 
>>    I don't exactly understand, what is your PBS env definition in
>>    OpenMOLE ?
>> 
>> 
>>    Le 04/11/2015 11:17, Murat Yildizoglu a écrit :
>>>    Hi again,
>>> 
>>>    (I hope that someone will be able go indicate me a trick to save a
>>>    configuration index in the CSV file)
>>> 
>>>    I am testing our PBS based cluster. But, I have the impression
>>>    that I am not setting correctly the node and threadsd parameters.
>>>    For now I have asked 50 nodes with 4 threads for all my
>>>    experiments but when I check the generated jobs has this
>>>    parameters for each job. Since I cannot see exactly the content of
>>>    the job generated by OM, I am not sure that this is the correct
>>>    setting.
>>>    Since I am on a local cluster, probably setting node=1 and
>>>    thread=1 would give a quicker advancement on the jobs queue, and
>>>    quicker execution of the jobs, no?
>>> 
>>>    Best,
>>> 
>>>    Murat
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    -- 
>>>    Prof. Murat Yildizoglu
>>> 
>>>    Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV 
>>>    GREThA (UMR CNRS 5113)
>>>    Avenue Léon Duguit
>>>    33608 Pessac cedex
>>>    France
>>> 
>>>    Bureau : E-331
>>> 
>>>    mail: yildi-at-u-bordeaux4.fr <http://yildi-at-u-bordeaux4.fr>
>>> 
>>>    web: yildizoglu.info <http://yildizoglu.info>
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>    OpenMOLE-users mailing list
>>>    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>    http://fedex.iscpif.fr/mailman/listinfo/openmole-users
>> 
>> 
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    OpenMOLE-users mailing list
>>    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>    http://fedex.iscpif.fr/mailman/listinfo/openmole-users
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Prof. Murat Yildizoglu
>> 
>> Note: Please use the following address as such
>> 
>> UNIVERSITE DE BORDEAUX 
>> GREThA (UMR CNRS 5113)
>> MURAT YILDIZOGLU
>> 16 AVENUE LEON DUGUIT
>> CS 50057 
>> 33608 PESSAC CEDEX 
>> FRANCE
>> 
>> Bureau : E-331
>> 
>> mail: murat.yildizoglu at u-bordeaux.fr <http://u-bordeaux.fr>
>> 
>> web: www.yildizoglu.fr <http://www.yildizoglu.fr>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenMOLE-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://fedex.iscpif.fr/mailman/listinfo/openmole-users
> 
> -- 
> Jonathan Passerat-Palmbach, PhD
> Research Associate
> Department of Computing
> Imperial College London
> 
> South Kensington Campus
> Huxley Building - room 344
> 180 Queen's Gate
> London SW7 2AZ
> 

_______________________________________________
OpenMOLE-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://fedex.iscpif.fr/mailman/listinfo/openmole-users

Reply via email to