I still have the issue with this last version.
Juste

> Le 31 déc. 2015 à 14:30, Romain Reuillon <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
> I just fixed some programing errors in this branch.
> 
> Romain
> 
> Le 31/12/2015 13:01, Romain Reuillon a écrit :
>> It would be a little bit more complicated since netlogo is turned into an 
>> osgi bundle by OpenMOLE. However I did a dirty trick to close those 
>> classloaders in this branch of OpenMOLE:  
>> <https://github.com/openmole/openmole/tree/closeNetLogoClassLoader>https://github.com/openmole/openmole/tree/closeNetLogoClassLoader
>>  <https://github.com/openmole/openmole/tree/closeNetLogoClassLoader>
>> 
>> Could you try it?
>> 
>> Le 31/12/2015 12:52, Juste Raimbault a écrit :
>>> ok thank you very much for the quick bug fix, hope netlogo will quickly 
>>> merge it ; in the meantime in can also compile your fork of netlogo and 
>>> replace the netlogo jar in openmole plugins, will simply replacing the 
>>> netlogo jar with the new one do the job ?
>>> 
>>> Juste 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Juste Raimbault
>>> Doctorant en géographie
>>> UMR 8504 CNRS - Géographie-Cités / UMR-T 9403 IFSTTAR - LVMT
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Le 31 déc. 2015 à 12:46, Romain Reuillon <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
>>>> 
>>>> I made a pull request:  
>>>> <https://github.com/NetLogo/NetLogo/pull/908>https://github.com/NetLogo/NetLogo/pull/908
>>>>  <https://github.com/NetLogo/NetLogo/pull/908>
>>>> 
>>>> In the meantime I'll try to implement a quick and dirty solution in 
>>>> OpenMOLE to see if it solve the pb.
>>>> 
>>>> Le 31/12/2015 11:58, Romain Reuillon a écrit :
>>>>> Maybe, the reset method (in the file above) should be called from the 
>>>>> dispose methode of the headless workspace:
>>>>> https://github.com/NetLogo/NetLogo/blob/5.x/src/main/org/nlogo/workspace/ExtensionManager.java
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://github.com/NetLogo/NetLogo/blob/5.x/src/main/org/nlogo/workspace/ExtensionManager.java>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Romain
>>>>> 
>>>>> Le 31/12/2015 11:46, Romain Reuillon a écrit :
>>>>>> Hi Juste,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> it looks like a bug of netlogo headless that doesn't close the 
>>>>>> extensions when it is disposed :(... Could you submit a ticket to the 
>>>>>> netlogo team?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Le 31/12/2015 11:37, Juste Raimbault a écrit :
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm currently experiencing an issue with a reasonable size exploration 
>>>>>>> of Netlogo5Task ;
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   - Running on a local environement, the exploration fails after around 
>>>>>>> 1000 completed tasks, with the exception "FileNotFoundException (too 
>>>>>>> many files open)"
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   - I relaunched the experiment and monitored progressively opened file 
>>>>>>> by the java task for openmole, using
>>>>>>>        lsof -p [openmole pid] | grep 
>>>>>>> ~/.openmole/[host]/.tmp/[experiment-dir] | wc -l
>>>>>>>     where [openmole pid], [host] and [experiment-dir] are replaced with 
>>>>>>> actual values.  It appears indeed that this count grows linearly with 
>>>>>>> completed tasks, and that *.jar files corresponding to netlogo 
>>>>>>> extensions (2 used in the model) are indeed kept open, even after task 
>>>>>>> completion and deletion : adding a 'grep "(deleted)"' in the pipe also 
>>>>>>> yields linear number of opened files ; what should cause the exception 
>>>>>>> because of system or jvm file open limit.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Is it something I miss with the Netlogo5Task like an extra parameter 
>>>>>>> that tells it to close open files when finished ? or is it an issue 
>>>>>>> with netlogo or the embedding of netlogo that does not close open files 
>>>>>>> when finished ?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thank you in advance ; and happy new year's Eve tonight !
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Juste
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Juste Raimbault
>>>>>>> Doctorant en géographie
>>>>>>> UMR 8504 CNRS - Géographie-Cités / UMR-T 9403 IFSTTAR - LVMT
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> OpenMOLE-users mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>> http://fedex.iscpif.fr/mailman/listinfo/openmole-users 
>>>>>>> <http://fedex.iscpif.fr/mailman/listinfo/openmole-users>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> OpenMOLE-users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>> http://fedex.iscpif.fr/mailman/listinfo/openmole-users 
>>>>>> <http://fedex.iscpif.fr/mailman/listinfo/openmole-users>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OpenMOLE-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> http://fedex.iscpif.fr/mailman/listinfo/openmole-users 
>>>>> <http://fedex.iscpif.fr/mailman/listinfo/openmole-users>
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OpenMOLE-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> http://fedex.iscpif.fr/mailman/listinfo/openmole-users 
>>>> <http://fedex.iscpif.fr/mailman/listinfo/openmole-users>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenMOLE-users mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://fedex.iscpif.fr/mailman/listinfo/openmole-users 
>>> <http://fedex.iscpif.fr/mailman/listinfo/openmole-users>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenMOLE-users mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://fedex.iscpif.fr/mailman/listinfo/openmole-users 
>> <http://fedex.iscpif.fr/mailman/listinfo/openmole-users>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenMOLE-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fedex.iscpif.fr/mailman/listinfo/openmole-users

_______________________________________________
OpenMOLE-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://fedex.iscpif.fr/mailman/listinfo/openmole-users

Reply via email to