Hi all,
I can help with testing the UIMA training support with annotated test data
crawled from various websites since I'm going to do that for a college
course I'm speaking to, so I'd be happy to help (any hints on which pieces
need stronger tests is welcome).
Tommaso

2011/3/29 Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]>

> On 3/29/11 7:27 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>> On Mar 29, 2011, at 12:57 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
>>
>>  On 3/29/11 6:03 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>>
>>>> Overall, artifacts look good.
>>>>
>>>>  From a packaging standpoint:
>>>>
>>>> * NOTICE.txt needs the JWNL copyright statement in it per the terms of
>>>> BSD
>>>>
>>>> * UIMA reference should also be in the NOTICE (as should any other
>>>> dependency that requires it).  Technically, since we aren't redistributing
>>>> the library, I don't think need to, but I think we should for completeness.
>>>>
>>>> How come the UIMA stuff isn't in the binary?  Just curious.
>>>>
>>> There are different ways to run OpenNLP in UIMA, one is to create the
>>> sample pear
>>> and start it up in the uima document analyzer, but that one is
>>> distributed with UIMA.
>>>
>>> Anyway I will fix the NOTICE file as suggested by Grant for RC 6, I hope
>>> we are then
>>> ready to release,
>>>
>> With the next candidate, you should call a vote.  We need at least 3 PPMC
>> votes that are +1 and no -1's.  Votes from others should be taken seriously
>> as well.  I typically treat a -1 from anyone as binding or at least
>> warranting further investigation.  Once the PPMC vote passes, then we must
>> ask the Incubator PMC to vote.  This is only needed while in the Incubator.
>>
>> I would also recommend reading http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>>
>
> Thanks, through my work on UIMA I am aware with this process. The reason I
> did not ask for the vote yet was that a little testing
> is still missing and that I wanted the packaging being checked. If every
> thing goes well I will call the for the vote next week on RC6.
>
> Jörn
>

Reply via email to