HI James,

Are you worried about contributions that would not help the project to
be better?

I think as incubator project, it needs to attract more interest and
good contributions to grow the committers and community of the
project.


- Henry

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:35 PM, James Kosin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 5/31/2011 1:22 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> I just had a look at the commit history, and there are very few people
>> making very many commits. In fact, the #1 committer is rather far
>> ahead even of the #2 committer.
>>
>> This is not a recipe for a successful escape from the incubator.
>> Writing code is wonderful and all that, but if you want to be a TLP, I
>> would advise you to put some effort into marketing and attracting more
>> participants.
>>
>> --benson
> Benson,
>
> The landscape is a bit daunting currently.  Hopefully it will change as
> we add support for the open model architecture and allow easy
> integration of different neural training networks into the landscape.
> More than just a perception and maxent, not that there is anything wrong
> with them.
>
> I currently, am working on my thesis; so, don't have too much time to
> spend on the project at current.  I have been only a recent addition
> with some of the items I've found in the architecture ... OpenNLP is
> still growing as far as projects go and it may take us a while to catch
> up.
>
> Jorn currently has been the large pusher of changes recently; however,
> Jason is also a large contributor.  I'm sure the list is a lot bigger in
> the large scale; however, the area of NLP is a bit new/old and requires
> a lot of groundwork.  I think, most miss the mark what the real power of
> NLP actually is other than finding text in a large document, or telling
> what form of speech is being used in a paragraph.
> Most of the libraries here are useful to many; however, the real power
> comes when integrating with a real Human-computer interface using
> natural language understanding.  In theory, with the right tools, the
> computer will be able to read a book and understand the content and
> extract ideas and thoughts from the document easily and be able to
> understand them.
>
> I'm all for recruiting more help; but, the real question is are there
> people willing to take on the challenge of the real landscape?
>
> James
>



-- 
Thanks,
Henry

Reply via email to