2012/2/14 Riccardo Tasso <[email protected]>:
> On 26/01/2012 20:39, Olivier Grisel wrote:
>>
>> In my experience the DBpedia type links for Person, Place and
>> Organization are very good quality. No false positives, there might be
>> some missing links though.
>
>
> Probably you're rigth if you speak of english dataset. I'm using the italian
> one, found at:
> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/3.7-i18n/it/instance_types_it.nt.bz2
>
> It is good for Person and Place classes, but it doesn't contain any Company!
> For them I'll use my standard technique, just reading the wikipedia template
> dump.

Indeed even in http://downloads.dbpedia.org/3.7/it/instance_types_it.nt.bz2
there is no entity with type http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Organisation
while there are many both for English, German and French for instance.

This looks like a bug in the template mappings. This is probably
fixable here: http://mappings.dbpedia.org/index.php/Main_Page

However, for entities that have it <-> en linked wikipedia pages you
can combine:

http://downloads.dbpedia.org/3.7/it/wikipedia_links_it.nt.bz2

along with:

http://downloads.dbpedia.org/3.7/en/instance_types_en.nt.bz2

to find the type of italian wikilinks in the Italian wikipedia dumps.
This is how I do it with pignlproc to support the French language
corpus.

-- 
Olivier
http://twitter.com/ogrisel - http://github.com/ogrisel

Reply via email to