Yes, I would use it. On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Aliaksandr Autayeu <[email protected]>wrote:
> Great idea, I like it. > > Aliaksandr > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Joern Kottmann <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > My idea was to just use the same argument and consider it to be > > a class name in the case the lookup in the map fails. > > > > Jörn > > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:30 PM, [email protected] < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > I think it would be possible to somehow pass in arguments to the parser > > > factory. > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Joern Kottmann <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > it would be nice to have a plugin mechanism to load a custom > > > > format parser which is implemented in user code. > > > > > > > > To add support for such a parser right now the parser must be > > registered > > > > in the StreamFactoryRegistery class. > > > > > > > > We could allow to pass in a class name in places where a format > parser > > > > could > > > > be passed in. > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > Jörn > > > > > > > > > >
