[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13088682#comment-13088682
]
Joern Kottmann commented on OPENNLP-255:
----------------------------------------
No, not really, hashCode implementation are a weak spot in OpenNLP. They are
often abusing strings or other objects to pass on the calculation of the hash.
That might at least work, but might be a performance issue here and there.
Feel free to close this issue, if you are done here.
> Span.hashCode() does not include the member type in hash calculation
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OPENNLP-255
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-255
> Project: OpenNLP
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: tools-1.5.2-incubating
> Reporter: William Colen
> Fix For: tools-1.5.2-incubating
>
>
> Should include the member type in hashCode calculation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
