Hi, Thanks for your reply. I would love to use this. However, I am kind of stuck for lack of documentations around it.
I am trying to use the code as is and do some basic analysis. However, the problem that I am facing (may be a newbie problem), is the entry point to the coref. i have seen that rest of the tools use kind of a common interface to interact with them (as documented). I am currently going with the assumption that it will work the same way as others (may be some changes). That said, if you could provide me with the entry point (like a class name), that would be of great help. I would love to help with this (as much as I can with my limited knowledge). On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Jörn Kottmann <kottm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/30/11 7:34 AM, SAMIK CHAKRABORTY wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> i was looking for the coreference resolution using OpenNLP and UIMA. I >> found out that this does not exist in the opennlp-uima code base. >> >> Also this jira issue does not have any pointers to it: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/OPENNLP-70<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-70> >> >> I found out that a lot of work has been done in the package >> opennlp.tools.coref. >> >> I want to understand a few things: >> >> 1. Is the code in opennlp.tools.coref package is ready for a wider >> consumption - other than few items like UIMA annotation creation and CAS >> services? >> 2. If the answer to the first query is "yes". Can I start with a simple >> use >> case like use the package to work on? >> 3. I didn't find any good entry point for the coref, like a JUnit test >> case >> to start with. If anyone can tell me an entry point and some pointers to >> start that would of great help. >> > > We currently cannot train the coref component. For this we would need > to have access to coref training data. Which I do not have. > That is the reason why it cannot be really maintained by the community. > > I have never really used it, but I would like to change that and also work > on > the training part. I as well need the UIMA Integration. > > I assume the code is easy to get stable for production use, but it might > need > a bit time. > > Anyway it would be really great if you could help us to improve the > situation. > > Jörn > > > >
