On May 24, 2008, at 12:14 PM, DJ Gregor wrote: > On Sat, 24 May 2008 13:11:17 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> http://bugzilla.opennms.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2508 >> >> Now since we have Jetty built-in and enabled by default, should we >> stop >> distributing the non-Jetty webapp in $OPENNMS_HOME/webapps/opennms >> as a >> part of >> the base distribution? If people want to install it, let them >> download a >> separate package. This could also let us remove the (now confusing) >> support >> for installing the webapp into Tocmat from the installer. > > I notice this every now and then, so I thought I'd open it up as a bug > and bring it up here for discussion. What do people think about no > longer distributing the non-Jetty webapp with the base OpenNMS > distribution? >
+1 I've read the other comments. I think it is safe to assume we will not do anything to explicitly not support tomcat, but in the interest of keeping the base OpenNMS distribution small, this would be a good thing. Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ: http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ opennms-devel mailing list To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel
