On 10 Nov 2008, at 03:10, David Hustace wrote: > > After thinking about this a while, I wonder if adding a few more > ticket states for which the service layer could check would be in > order. Such as CREATE_FAILED/UPDATE_FAILED/CLOSE_FAILED states. > Each of these could generate events->alarms. What do you think? >
I think that this is a good idea. If we did this, then we could make the service layer responsible for dealing with failed updates. Removes my plugins dependence on opennms-services, which is a good thing. I'll do that. .... J ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ: http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ opennms-devel mailing list To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel