On 10 Nov 2008, at 03:10, David Hustace wrote:
>
> After thinking about this a while, I wonder if adding a few more  
> ticket states for which the service layer could check would be in  
> order.  Such as CREATE_FAILED/UPDATE_FAILED/CLOSE_FAILED states.   
> Each of these could generate events->alarms.  What do you think?
>

I think that this is a good idea. If we did this, then we could make  
the service layer responsible for dealing with failed updates. Removes  
my plugins dependence on opennms-services, which is a good thing. I'll  
do that.

.... J

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ:
http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ

opennms-devel mailing list

To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this 
page:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel

Reply via email to