Hi Marcel, > we can follow them, but I think we actually never did.
We can start now. In time other projects will have a look at openobex and perhaps quote or copy its behavior. I know I did with obexftp... >> Actually it's about forward compatibility. > > No I don't see that, because I am quite sure that I have done this > before. Does the dynamic loader really care. The problem lies with the dependancy checking. If the lib version doesn't reflect the api change (i.e. api enhancement) packaging will be a problem. > Sometimes it is a good idea to recompile the dependencies. And forcing > them to do is not a bad thing. Another reason to give a clear hint by using the right soname. No big deal otherwise, but I'd hate to see if packagers choose to install a openobex-1.1.so.1.0.1 just to enforce that rebuilding. cu, Christian ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Openobex-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openobex-users
