On Fri, 26 May 2006, Christian W. Zuckschwerdt wrote:
I could parse and use all of them. The question is which scheme to suggest to
users?
I'd prefer the last one. The first one I think is recommended by the URI RFC
but looks strange (because there is no "://" part). Also it implies a
hierarchy and the transport is not related to the service.
The second one is just clumsy and difficult to read or spell.
Any comments are much welcome.
I have a question. Why is this needed in the first place? What are the
benefits?
Alexander
Homepage: http://www.sensi.org/~ak/
-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Openobex-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openobex-users
