2009/5/21 Christian Zuckschwerdt <christ...@zuckschwerdt.org>: > We are currently at ABI version 5, stepping back to ABI version 2 > could lead to trouble. > > But you are right, starting fresh and with a soname that hasn't been > in use, any pick is fine. > > > Details about the original thought: > > OpenOBEX uses a version-info of 5:1:4 now which translates to a soname > of 1.4.1. > (The scheme here is current : revision : age which is translated to a > soname of current-age . age . revision.) > The soname of .2.0 (ABI 2, age 0) tells to be compatible to e.g. the > soname of .1.1 (ABI 2, age 1, revisions ommited). > > But that's just the theoretical side -- I can't even say if some > linker might choose librarys that liberal. Also there shouldn't be any > apps linked to ABI 2 around any more, right?
I know nothing about sonames, but this page http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/html_node/Updating-version-info.html makes it clear that version-info should become 6:0:0, if we're at 5:1:4 now. -- Alexander ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com _______________________________________________ Openobex-users mailing list Openobex-users@lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openobex-users
