Am Freitag, 27. Mai 2011, 09:54:13 schrieb Luiz Augusto von Dentz: > Hi Hendrik, > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Hendrik Sattler > > <p...@hendrik-sattler.de> wrote: > > Zitat von Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.de...@gmail.com>: > > [...] > > > > Both of those are already fixed in my releasing-2.0 tree, see > > https://gitorious.org/openobex/mainline/commit/a862b3d3eec7c0008ebcfcf8a7 > > 5150f8a3f3bc19 > > > > I already posted them here. Except one mail from Johan, nothing happened. > > I admit that you did clean up ircp better than I did, though :) > > Do you want to rebase the second patch on my tree, basically on-top of > > https://gitorious.org/openobex/mainline/commits/ebc1dc31734bec3a2d8b172cf > > 959b3844a29a3d9 > > Well in that case why you don't rebase your tree, my patches seems to > fix just the issues with GCC 4.6 while yours fixes some other things > so it might be clearer to just have them split meaning that you should > rework your patches anyway. I know this sound inconvenient because you > have posted similar changes before, but they are not upstream, besides > that if I do rebase we will have a commit to fix another commit not > upstream (e.g. handling scanf return correctly), which IMO is not good > for sake of repository history. This fixes should go in as soon as > possible.
I'm sick of the current situation, so I don't care anymore. HS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. Download your free trial now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Openobex-users mailing list Openobex-users@lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openobex-users
