Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2012, 15:44:01 schrieb Iain Hibbert: > On Sun, 11 Mar 2012, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > > Is anybody still interested in openobex? I recall rumours of a 2.0 > > > release.. > > > > I am. > > Well, since Hendrik is the main interested party perhaps Marcel could be > convinced to transfer (or redirect) his domain to the gitorius page that > Hendrik maintains? Either that or just call the openobex project defunct > and fork it with a new name..
I think I will keep the name in any case... > > However, it is also obvious that openobex has some problems. I will > > address those before releasing 2.0. This will include API changes. I > > don't know, yet, if compatibility with 1.5 will be kept. > > To be honest, any new release (1.6?) with the current changes would be > welcomed Ok, I will tag the current master branch on Gitorious. > As to the API, then yes I do agree that there are some problems. I would > not choose to use openobex if I were to write an OBEX program, not least > because the documentation is minimal. I have worked on software using > openobex and found that it was really difficult to work with. However, I > don't really have any better ideas :) An updated API will be easier to understand and a bit more object oriented (I plan on writing a C++ wrapper). HS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ _______________________________________________ Openobex-users mailing list Openobex-users@lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openobex-users
