On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote: > Xiaofan Chen wrote: >> OpenOCD does support SWD with ST-Link, even without >> much SWD codes on the OpenOCD side. > > It's a perfect example of how *not* to do open source development. > > The situation is incredibly embarrassing for ST and OpenOCD. (ST > because they proposed the code, and OpenOCD because the code was > included.)
Hmm, please explain. Is it really true that ST proposed the code? I thought the code is partially based on another existing open-source project. https://github.com/texane/stlink ST helped the author texane. https://github.com/texane/stlink/blob/master/ACKNOWLEDGMENTS And OpenOCD's stlink_usb.c mentioned that the code is based on texane's work. 1 /*************************************************************************** 2 * Copyright (C) 2011-2012 by Mathias Kuester * 3 * Mathias Kuester <kes...@freenet.de> * 4 * * 5 * Copyright (C) 2012 by Spencer Oliver * 6 * s...@spen-soft.co.uk * 7 * * 8 * This code is based on https://github.com/texane/stlink * -- Xiaofan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
