OpenOCD is not performance bound going forward. Our biggest problem is to have the code be as maintainable as possible to attract and retain first rate contributors.
From that point of view there would have to be a HUGE performance benefit for us not to ditch the older messier code. On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Peter Stuge <[email protected]> wrote: > Freddie Chopin wrote: >> The most important is the first one, so I'll have to browse the net >> searching for such binary or maybe I'll try to compile myself and check... > > I seem to remember that there was some comparison between ftd2xx and > mpsse, with the results being basically the same. > > > //Peter > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d > _______________________________________________ > OpenOCD-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel -- Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project? US toll free 1-866-980-3434 http://www.zylin.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
