On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Freddie Chopin <[email protected]> wrote: > So what's the plan here? Is ft2232.c going to be deleted? Is it going to > be kept but no further changes for this code will be accepted?
Hello Freddie :-) Thank you for this important discussion as it also somehow affect my works :-) As I have already mentioned in the SWD/LibSWD thread the best solution for me woul be: Add my swd commits and mark ft2232 obsolete, then make _last_ release of the 0.x.y series and start working on 1.x.y series, where is no ft2232 driver and we have Adapter layer implemented as well as others internals reorganization. This gives a working solution to the people straight away, brings a release in desired time period, keeps things backwards compatible. We put a thick line on the past and set course for future. This must happen one day, why not today. This approach should satisfy both sides - solution will be backward compatible and bring something new to the "old code" that can be used straight away and won't simply dissapear, also it will start definitive process of internals redesign and improvements and leave old stuff behind. Best regards :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
