On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 11:27:16AM +0200, Freddie Chopin wrote: > W dniu 2013-05-05 11:20, Paul Fertser pisze: >> However, I would expect Debian (and other distro) people would be a >> bit unhappy about FTBFS on some platforms (namely ARM), what is the >> plan about it? > > The patches you posted were just a bit too late - I tried NOT to merge > any significant code changes in the RC phases so there would be no > surprising breakage.
Well, you know how distro people use autobuilders for a wide variety of platforms and when some particular package can't be built cleanly it might defer new version acceptance significantly. And we all want OpenOCD users to run the-latest-and-greatest code, don't we :) > I expect your patches to be merged very soon in the new dev cycle. I think we should try building OpenOCD for as many platforms as possible and then it'd be nice to have 0.7.1 release to have Debian maintainer put that into unstable at least. Currently the situation is following (http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openocd.html): stable: 0.5.0-1 testing: 0.5.0-1 unstable: 0.6.1-1 >> Also, should an ARM target be added to Jenkins? > > If only we can assume OpenOCD is working on that platform than maybe... Well, my Raspberry Pi runs it just fine. And I can test an Olimex with AC100 Tegra2 netbook tomorrow. ARM machines are really taking off now so at least ARM is really worth adding to Jenkins IMHO. -- Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software! mailto:fercer...@gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2 _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
