On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Andreas Fritiofson <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Nader <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> # 12: 0x00280000 (0x4000 16kB) not protected
>>
>
> The offset for this sector and those following it looks wrong. The second
> bank is adjacent to the first according to RM0090. I'll take a look at the
> code to see what it's up to. I don't have the board to test unfortunately.
>
Yep, you're affected by a bug in v0.7.0 that was fixed in 9f1616d2b merged
2013-06-21. Either compile your own OpenOCD based on latest git or see if
Freddie has some post-0.7.0 development snapshot that includes the fix.
/Andreas
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
OpenOCD-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
